9 Comments
User's avatar
Old Scratch's avatar

Ideology trumps methodology once again. Could we even land on the moon today?

Expand full comment
Stone Age Herbalist's avatar

That's one of those questions that should occupy public policy, it should drive it.

Expand full comment
Alberta's avatar

Thanks for writing this. I've seen Gunung Padang and saw nothing that indicates that the claims of being an ancient megalithic site are true. But I'm no archaeologist, nor am I a geologist. I read Danny's paper, and am very suspicious of dating technology, saw nothing there that convinced me. Your paper makes a good case. I appreciate it.

Expand full comment
Stone Age Herbalist's avatar

Glad to break it down for non-specialists. People mostly 'want' it to be true, which flies in the face of good science

Expand full comment
Humbert Rivière's avatar

> ... in the 1980’s - 1990’s as part of a nationalist push to promote the deep past of the country.

That in itself isn't necessarily bad as one should recognize and be proud of their country's origins. But if that is stacked on top of fabricated or just plain false claims it tend of does the opposite.

Expand full comment
Joyce Wycoff's avatar

Thanks for a rational explanation of the site and the fantasies around it.

Expand full comment
Stone Age Herbalist's avatar

You're welcome. One should always beware the little nationalisms and their insistence on ancient days of glory

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 7, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Stone Age Herbalist's avatar

I remember new atheism and the sceptic movement before it went insane, those guys were cringe at times, but maybe we'll come to regret not having people spending their leisure time debunking nonsense

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 8, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Throgmorton's avatar

A skeptic is now defined as someone who uncritically defers to the experts. They were pushing that definition in the climate debate a decade ago to distinguish 'real' skeptics from those who persisted in asking inconvenient questions. It's probably still to be found on that website with its doubly oxymoronic name, 'Skeptical Science.'

Expand full comment