I get why people want to see more about prehistoric religion and art, but I think it’s more important to provide a different foundation for thinking about Man’s prehistory. With lots of Regime-disseminated “knowledge” being recently disproven (e.g., out of Africa) or fashioned out of whole cloth (e.g., “Cheddar man was black,” “women hav…
I get why people want to see more about prehistoric religion and art, but I think it’s more important to provide a different foundation for thinking about Man’s prehistory. With lots of Regime-disseminated “knowledge” being recently disproven (e.g., out of Africa) or fashioned out of whole cloth (e.g., “Cheddar man was black,” “women have dem hips bc they hunted medium-size prey,” etc.), the time is opportune to right the ship.
I get why people want to see more about prehistoric religion and art, but I think it’s more important to provide a different foundation for thinking about Man’s prehistory. With lots of Regime-disseminated “knowledge” being recently disproven (e.g., out of Africa) or fashioned out of whole cloth (e.g., “Cheddar man was black,” “women have dem hips bc they hunted medium-size prey,” etc.), the time is opportune to right the ship.